Heretic Media
How Global Warming distorts US Jobless Figures
Mar 2nd
How Global Warming distorts US Jobless Figures
We all know global warming causes everything bad and nothing good, but what is the worst thing that it could cause?
Nope.
The death of the Loch Ness Monster?
Not even close.
No, the worst thing that Global Warming could di is to make Obama look bad. (And I don’t have to use all six degrees of Global Warming to do it)
Where did I leave my Keys to Airforce One?
February 10, 2010 – Right in line with Time Magazine’s typical political stance, they expressed how the blizzards of 2010 were caused by global warming:
In the meantime, warmer air could be supercharged with moisture and, as long as the temperature remains below 32°F, it will result in blizzards rather than drenching winter rainstorms.
And if Time magazine isn’t enough for you, the National Wildlife Federation was a little more certain that it was Global Warming causing the snow. (ripped apart by a fantastic article at Cliamteaudit.org)
Global warming is having a seemingly peculiar effect on winter weather in the northern United States. Winter is becoming milder and shorter on average; spring arrives 10 to 14 days earlier than it did just 20 years ago. But most Snowbelt areas are still experiencing extremely heavy snowstorms. Some places are even expected to have more heavy snowfall events as storm tracks shift northward and as reduced ice cover on the Great Lakes increases lake-effect snowfalls. Even as global warming slowly changes the character of winter, we will still experience significant year-to-year variability in snowfall and temperature because many different factors are at play.
So, according to the greenies, Global Warming causes global cooling.
What does this have to do with US jobless figures and making Obama look bad you may ask?
The White House came out yesterday to try to head of the upcoming and obviously negative news about US jobless figures.
WASHINGTON, March 1 (Reuters) – White House economic adviser Larry Summers said on Monday winter blizzards were likely to distort U.S. February jobless figures, which are due to be released on Friday.
“The blizzards that affected much of the country during the last month are likely to distort the statistics. So it’s going to be very important … to look past whatever the next figures are to gauge the underlying trends,” Summers said in an interview with CNBC, according to a transcript.
Construction activity was hit particularly hard by the storms, but many restaurants and stores also had to close, putting the brakes on hiring plans and temporarily throwing some employees out of work.
Let me paraphrase:
Wait wait everybody, before we tell you how bad they are, remember, it is all because of the winter blizzards. Don’t blame Obama. Blame the weather.
So there you have it. Global Warming = Global Cooling = Blizzards = disruption in Obama’s Plan = Obama looks bad.
When will the craziness ever cease?
Lift your head up high and blow your brains out
Mar 1st
Lift your head up high and blow your brains out
From multiple news sources (here, here, here, here)
For an Argentinean couple, their fears over the effects of Climate Change were the rational reason to take their lives and the lives of their children. Their seven month old is still alive after a neighbor found the carnage three days later. The baby went three days with a bullet hole through her chest before she was found.
Reminds me of a song:
And they think us “teabaggers” are bad. “So save the planet and kill yourself.” What a bunch of idiots.
Netherlands adds to UN climate report controversy.
Feb 5th
The Netherlands are a bit confused. They have to be, there is no way to explain this away and still maintain any validity in the IPCC.
According to the 2007 IPCC Report, 55% of the Netherlands is below sea level. You can even see people who have been members of the Church of Global Warming referencing this since 2007. (here, here, here… it goes on, just do as Rosie O’Donnell says and “google it”)
The Netherlands however is a bit miffed, you see because only 26% of their land is below sea level. Or 29% more than the IPCC said.
According to the Dutch authorities, only 26 percent of the country is below sea level, and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will be asked to account for its figures, environment ministry spokesman Trimo Vallaart told AFP.
The incident could cause further embarrassment for the IPCC, which recently admitted a claim in the same report that global warming could melt Himalayan glaciers by 2035 was wrong.
IPCC experts calculated that 55 percent of the Netherlands was below sea level by adding the area below sea level — 26 percent — to the area threatened by river flooding — 29 percent — Vallaart said.
“They should have been clearer,” Vallaart said, adding that the Dutch office for environmental planning, an IPCC partner, had exact figures.
My favorite line in this article shows the contempt still for those who dare to question these people:
Glaciologists have discredited the Himalaya claim, which is being withdrawn, and the controversy has given fresh ammunition to climate skeptics.
Mother fracking seriously?? “given fresh ammunition to climate skeptics”? No one else is questioning this crap but the “Skeptics”?
Oh yea, that’s right. That’s why they call it faith.
No evidence could be found to show the claim had been published in a peer-reviewed journal and reports in Britain have said the reference came from green group the WWF, who in turn sourced it to the New Scientist magazine.
You have the IPCC here referencing “peer-reviewed” stuff that referenced the World Wildlife Fund. Tell me… Isn’t a scientific journal referencing an Environmentalist group report be akin to the kind of bias they yelp about if a scientific journals were to reference a company like, oh… Exxon?
Science is supposed to be objective. So what the crap would you call a peer-reviewed report that references the WWF that is then passed along as acceptable material to the IPCC?
Climate “Science” is based on anecdotal evidence
Jan 31st
There has been a lot of press lately about the Climate Change fraud going on, but this one puts a lot of their “Science” into perspective.
From Telegraph.co.uk:
In its most recent report, it stated that observed reductions in mountain ice in the Andes, Alps and Africa was being caused by global warming, citing two papers as the source of the information.
However, it can be revealed that one of the sources quoted was a feature article published in a popular magazine for climbers which was based on anecdotal evidence from mountaineers about the changes they were witnessing on the mountainsides around them.
The other was a dissertation written by a geography student, studying for the equivalent of a master’s degree, at the University of Berne in Switzerland that quoted interviews with mountain guides in the Alps.
The revelations, uncovered by The Sunday Telegraph, have raised fresh questions about the quality of the information contained in the report, which was published in 2007.
So, let me get this straight… The entire world’s economic system and the freedom of all people on Earth is threatened because some ice climbers were chatting and some geography student quoted them in a school report?
Well, while we’re taking school reports as expert evidence for policy change, I would like to quote my nephew:
I would ROFLMAO if I wasn’t all like WTF.
![Recommend [cogw]](http://s3.amazonaws.com/arkayne-media/img/badge/02me.png){kind=icon}